While this paper relates more to our week about the nervous system than this past week's lectures, I greatly enjoyed delving into this publication. If you have any interest in brain science, I would highly recommend giving it a moment of your time, because it really is an entertaining read. Though the paper's findings are fascinating within themselves (I mean, the scientists mounted frogs on corkboard, conducted neurosurgery to reveal their optic nerve, successfully recorded individual action potentials from both myelinated and unmyelinated axons, concluded that feature detectors existed, and then patched up the frogs for release into the wild), the way the paper is written is also quite marvelous from a literary standpoint. Lettvin, the first author, began his early career as a poet, then became an electrical engineer, and then turned to neuroscience to make one of the most quintessential discoveries to our understanding of the visual system to date. His background as a poet really shines through in the stylistic aspects of this paper, and I think that's perhaps what makes it so entertaining. Lettvin brings the frog to life, as if he were studying some divine being, and cracks intellectual jokes throughout the paper. Again, really worth a read! Sometimes I wonder why that sense of humor has slowly crept out of science as we read more contemporary papers. I had more fun reading this paper than most any other paper in my undergraduate career thus far, and I retained more from it due to my interest in the narrative it creates. Maybe, as the next generation of scientists and authors of scientific publications, this aspect of playfulness and engaging with readers might be something to think about.
Here's a link to the paper pdf: What the frog's eye tells the frog's brain









